NO 1.5070000000000001 H-Termination proof of /home/matraf/haskell/eval_FullyBlown_Fast/empty.hs
H-Termination of the given Haskell-Program with start terms could successfully be disproven:



HASKELL
  ↳ LR

mainModule Main
  ((catchHugsException :: IO a  ->  (HugsException  ->  IO a ->  IO a) :: IO a  ->  (HugsException  ->  IO a ->  IO a)

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Lambda Reductions:
The following Lambda expression
\e
case k e of
 IO k' → k' f s

is transformed to
catchHugsException0 k f s e = 
case k e of
 IO k' → k' f s

The following Lambda expression
\fsHugs_Catch (m Hugs_Error (Hugs_Return . toObj)) (catchHugsException0 k f sf (s . fromObj)

is transformed to
catchHugsException1 m k f s = Hugs_Catch (m Hugs_Error (Hugs_Return . toObj)) (catchHugsException0 k f sf (s . fromObj)



↳ HASKELL
  ↳ LR
HASKELL
      ↳ CR

mainModule Main
  ((catchHugsException :: IO a  ->  (HugsException  ->  IO a ->  IO a) :: IO a  ->  (HugsException  ->  IO a ->  IO a)

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Case Reductions:
The following Case expression
case k e of
 IO k' → k' f s

is transformed to
catchHugsException00 f s (IO k') = k' f s



↳ HASKELL
  ↳ LR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ CR
HASKELL
          ↳ BR

mainModule Main
  ((catchHugsException :: IO a  ->  (HugsException  ->  IO a ->  IO a) :: IO a  ->  (HugsException  ->  IO a ->  IO a)

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Replaced joker patterns by fresh variables and removed binding patterns.

↳ HASKELL
  ↳ LR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ CR
        ↳ HASKELL
          ↳ BR
HASKELL
              ↳ COR

mainModule Main
  ((catchHugsException :: IO a  ->  (HugsException  ->  IO a ->  IO a) :: IO a  ->  (HugsException  ->  IO a ->  IO a)

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Cond Reductions:
The following Function with conditions
undefined 
 | False
 = undefined

is transformed to
undefined  = undefined1

undefined0 True = undefined

undefined1  = undefined0 False



↳ HASKELL
  ↳ LR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ CR
        ↳ HASKELL
          ↳ BR
            ↳ HASKELL
              ↳ COR
HASKELL
                  ↳ Narrow
                  ↳ Narrow

mainModule Main
  (catchHugsException :: IO a  ->  (HugsException  ->  IO a ->  IO a)

module Main where
  import qualified Prelude



Haskell To QDPs


↳ HASKELL
  ↳ LR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ CR
        ↳ HASKELL
          ↳ BR
            ↳ HASKELL
              ↳ COR
                ↳ HASKELL
                  ↳ Narrow
                    ↳ AND
QDP
                        ↳ NonTerminationProof
                      ↳ QDP
                  ↳ Narrow

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

new_fromObj(vx8, ba) → new_fromObj(vx8, ba)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We used the non-termination processor [17] to show that the DP problem is infinite.
Found a loop by semiunifying a rule from P directly.

The TRS P consists of the following rules:

new_fromObj(vx8, ba) → new_fromObj(vx8, ba)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:none


s = new_fromObj(vx8, ba) evaluates to t =new_fromObj(vx8, ba)

Thus s starts an infinite chain as s semiunifies with t with the following substitutions:




Rewriting sequence

The DP semiunifies directly so there is only one rewrite step from new_fromObj(vx8, ba) to new_fromObj(vx8, ba).





↳ HASKELL
  ↳ LR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ CR
        ↳ HASKELL
          ↳ BR
            ↳ HASKELL
              ↳ COR
                ↳ HASKELL
                  ↳ Narrow
                    ↳ AND
                      ↳ QDP
QDP
                        ↳ NonTerminationProof
                  ↳ Narrow

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

new_toObj(vx9, ba) → new_toObj(vx9, ba)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We used the non-termination processor [17] to show that the DP problem is infinite.
Found a loop by semiunifying a rule from P directly.

The TRS P consists of the following rules:

new_toObj(vx9, ba) → new_toObj(vx9, ba)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:none


s = new_toObj(vx9, ba) evaluates to t =new_toObj(vx9, ba)

Thus s starts an infinite chain as s semiunifies with t with the following substitutions:




Rewriting sequence

The DP semiunifies directly so there is only one rewrite step from new_toObj(vx9, ba) to new_toObj(vx9, ba).




Haskell To QDPs


↳ HASKELL
  ↳ LR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ CR
        ↳ HASKELL
          ↳ BR
            ↳ HASKELL
              ↳ COR
                ↳ HASKELL
                  ↳ Narrow
                  ↳ Narrow
                    ↳ AND
QDP
                        ↳ NonTerminationProof
                      ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

new_fromObj(vx8, ba, []) → new_fromObj(vx8, ba, [])

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
We used the non-termination processor [17] to show that the DP problem is infinite.
Found a loop by semiunifying a rule from P directly.

The TRS P consists of the following rules:

new_fromObj(vx8, ba, []) → new_fromObj(vx8, ba, [])

The TRS R consists of the following rules:none


s = new_fromObj(vx8, ba, []) evaluates to t =new_fromObj(vx8, ba, [])

Thus s starts an infinite chain as s semiunifies with t with the following substitutions:




Rewriting sequence

The DP semiunifies directly so there is only one rewrite step from new_fromObj(vx8, ba, []) to new_fromObj(vx8, ba, []).





↳ HASKELL
  ↳ LR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ CR
        ↳ HASKELL
          ↳ BR
            ↳ HASKELL
              ↳ COR
                ↳ HASKELL
                  ↳ Narrow
                  ↳ Narrow
                    ↳ AND
                      ↳ QDP
QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

new_toObj(vx9, ba, []) → new_toObj(vx9, ba, [])

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.